On the YouTube channel “Maebul Show”, a live discussion was held featuring cultural critic Kim Gap-soo, lawyer Noh Jong-eon (law firm Jonjae) and broadcaster Heo Jae-moo.
Key points discussed included:
1. Mixed Opinions on NewJeans‘ Actions
– Kim Gap-soo criticized the group’s decision, calling it impulsive and questioning the binding nature of their demands.
– Lawyer Noh, however, defended NewJeans, calling their move strategic and citing legal precedents that trust breakdowns can justify contract termination.
2. Claims Against HYBE and ADOR
– Lawyer Noh highlighted allegations of abuse of power, referencing reports that HYBE’s then-CEO Park Ji-won suggested a “1.5-year vacation” for NewJeans, potentially a veiled threat to stall their career.
– The panel discussed the possibility of mutual lawsuits between HYBE and NewJeans, which could further erode trust.
3. Structural Critiques of HYBE
Criticism was directed at HYBE’s multi-label system, which, while innovative, was seen as blending K-pop’s corporate approach with a chaebol-like structure, potentially undermining artists’ creative independence.
4. Industry-Wide Implications
The case touches broader issues like artist rights versus industrial priorities, raising questions about whether K-pop should prioritize human rights or its global competitiveness.
5. Concerns Over HYBE’s Corporate Practices
Panelists discussed ethical concerns about HYBE’s listing process, suggesting potential legal violations and harm to small investors due to insider dealings.
The debate underscores tensions in K-pop’s evolving industry model, with NewJeans’ case spotlighting the balance between corporate control and artist autonomy.
Source: Naver
